A technician is comparing hypervisor architectures for a lab. Which statement correctly distinguishes a Type 1 hypervisor from a Type 2 hypervisor?
- AA Type 1 hypervisor is installed directly on the physical hardware, whereas a Type 2 hypervisor runs as software on top of an existing host operating system. Correct
- BA Type 1 hypervisor runs as an application on top of a host operating system, whereas a Type 2 hypervisor is installed directly on the hardware.
- CA Type 1 hypervisor supports only Linux guests, whereas a Type 2 hypervisor supports only Windows guests.
- DA Type 1 hypervisor requires no CPU virtualization support, whereas a Type 2 hypervisor requires hardware-assisted virtualization to function.
Why A is correct: Correct: Type 1 (bare-metal) sits directly on the hardware, while Type 2 (hosted) runs as an application above a conventional host operating system.
Why B is wrong: This is tempting because both types are being contrasted, but it reverses the definitions: the application-on-a-host model describes Type 2, not Type 1.
Why C is wrong: This sounds like a real limitation but is false: both hypervisor types are guest-agnostic and the distinction is where the hypervisor is installed, not which guest it runs.
Why D is wrong: This is plausible if you assume bare-metal avoids hardware needs, but it is wrong: both types benefit from and typically require CPU virtualization extensions.