An analyst maps existing detection rules against the MITRE ATT&CK matrix and marks techniques with no corresponding rule. What is this practice called and what does it reveal?
- APenetration testing, which reveals whether the analyst can exploit each mapped technique in production.
- BDetection gap analysis, which reveals adversary techniques the current tooling would fail to observe. Correct
- CRisk acceptance, which reveals the residual likelihood remaining after all controls are applied.
- DBaseline configuration, which reveals the approved settings each monitored asset should hold.
Why A is wrong: Testing controls is related work, but exploiting techniques is an offensive activity distinct from mapping detection coverage.
Why B is correct: Correct: mapping coverage to ATT&CK surfaces the techniques lacking detection, which is precisely detection gap analysis.
Why C is wrong: Residual risk is a real governance concept, yet it describes a decision about risk rather than the coverage-mapping exercise here.
Why D is wrong: Baselines matter for drift detection, but they document approved states rather than gaps in behavioural detection coverage.