CIA-3 domain - 15% of the exam

Internal Audit Plan

Internal Audit Plan is 15% of the CIA-3 exam. These are the objectives it covers, each with practice questions, with every answer explained.

The domain in numbers

48
Practice questions
3
Objectives
48
Medium

Where people go wrong

  • Judging reliance on the wrong criteria

    The wrong answers test whether to rely on another provider's work against factors that do not decide it: committee approval of the engagement, cost savings, a shared oversight body, strong documentation, or written confirmation from the manager whose controls were tested. Another wrong answer stops at competence and objectivity after a system change. Reliance rests on the provider's competence and objectivity, and on whether the scope and currency of the work still cover the internal audit objective. A reporting line into the tested area lowers reliance instead of ending it.

    See it in a sample question
  • Treating reliance as a transfer of responsibility

    Several wrong options say that leaning on the external auditors' testing moves ownership of the conclusion to them: seeking a statement accepting responsibility, attributing the conclusion entirely to the other provider, or making responsibility depend on documentation or on access to workpapers. Reliance substitutes another provider's evidence for some internal audit procedures. The chief audit executive still owns the resulting conclusion, discloses that it rests on the other work and to what extent, and judges whether the evidence is sufficient.

    See it in a sample question
  • Holding an approved plan fixed after a material change

    The wrong answers keep the approved plan unchanged after a material event such as a supplier collapse, a large acquisition or a replaced finance system. They wait for the next cycle, or treat a contingency reserve as the cap on how far the plan may respond. A risk-based plan is dynamic. A significant change in the risk profile triggers reassessment, and the revisions and their resource impact are communicated to the board or audit committee.

    See it in a sample question
  • Letting a request outrank the risk assessment

    A senior manager's lobbying, management's preference for the traditional schedule, an audit committee chair's suspicion and an operations manager's advisory request each appear as grounds to reorder or extend the plan. The wrong answers either act on the request at once or refuse it outright. Requests are legitimate sources of engagements, but they are weighed against risk, resources and independence safeguards, and any accepted change is agreed with the board.

    See it in a sample question
  • Ranking on inherent instead of residual risk

    The wrong options rank engagements on gross exposure before controls, on an average of the two measures, on control weakness alone, or on a management request. Inherent risk ignores the mitigation already in place, and control risk is only one component of what remains. The plan is ranked on residual risk, the exposure left after existing controls, because that is where limited audit effort covers the most uncovered risk.

    See it in a sample question

Objectives in this domain

What to study

The official documents this domain's practice questions cite most.

Sample questions from this domain

Free sampleInternal Audit Planmedium

At Oakhurst Logistics the chief audit executive plans to rely on control testing performed six months ago by an external assurance provider whose competence and objectivity she has already confirmed. Since that testing, the company migrated the affected process to a new system. How should this change affect her reliance decision?

  • AProceed with full reliance, because competence and objectivity were confirmed and those are the criteria that govern reliance
  • BDiscard the earlier work completely and treat the migrated process as if no assurance had ever been obtained over it
  • CAssess whether the earlier work still covers the current controls given the system change, and perform additional procedures on the parts the change has affected before relying Correct
  • DRely on the earlier work and record the system change as a matter for the next planning cycle rather than the current one
Reliance requires the other provider's work to remain relevant and current; a change to the process since testing means re-evaluating coverage and performing additional procedures. Competence and objectivity are necessary but not sufficient; the work must still be relevant to the controls now in place, so a post-testing system migration forces a currency assessment and targeted additional procedures rather than automatic full reliance.

Why A is wrong: Tempting because competence and objectivity are correctly confirmed, but relevance and currency also matter; work performed before a process changed may no longer address the controls now in operation.

Why B is wrong: Tempting because the change reduces the work's value, but portions unaffected by the migration may remain relevant, so discarding everything wastes reliable evidence and overstates the effect of the change.

Why C is correct: Correct. Reliance requires that the work remain relevant and sufficient for the current objective; a system migration since testing means the earlier evidence must be re-evaluated and gaps covered by fresh procedures.

Why D is wrong: Tempting because deferring keeps the current plan simple, but relying on evidence that predates a known process change and postponing the issue leaves a live control area inadequately assured.

Free sampleInternal Audit Planmedium

The chief audit executive at Pennistone Group has relied on the external financial auditors' control testing to reduce internal audit's own work in the sales cycle, and internal audit's conclusion in that area rests partly on that reliance. When reporting the sales-cycle results to the audit committee, how should the chief audit executive treat the reliance?

  • APresent the conclusion as internal audit's own and omit the reliance, since disclosing another provider's involvement could confuse the committee
  • BAttribute the sales-cycle conclusion entirely to the external auditors so the committee directs any follow-up questions to them
  • CReport only the areas internal audit tested directly and leave the sales cycle out of the communication until internal audit retests it independently
  • DDisclose that the conclusion relies on the external auditors' work, describe the extent of that reliance, and retain internal audit's responsibility for the overall conclusion Correct
When a conclusion draws on another provider's work, disclose the reliance and its extent while internal audit retains responsibility for the overall conclusion. Coordinated assurance still leaves the internal auditor accountable for conclusions it reports; transparency about the reliance and its extent lets the board judge the assurance obtained, and neither hiding nor offloading the reliance meets that standard.

Why A is wrong: Tempting because a clean single-voice conclusion reads simply, but concealing the basis for the conclusion misrepresents how the assurance was obtained and denies the committee information it needs to judge coverage.

Why B is wrong: Tempting because the external auditors did the testing, but internal audit retains responsibility for a conclusion it drew on leveraged work, so reassigning it to the other provider misstates accountability.

Why C is wrong: Tempting because it avoids explaining shared work, but withholding a completed conclusion the committee expects, and duplicating adequate testing, defeats the purpose of coordinated assurance.

Why D is correct: Correct. Transparent reporting discloses reliance and its extent while the internal auditor keeps ownership of the conclusion, giving the committee an accurate picture of how the assurance was assembled.

Free sampleInternal Audit Planmedium

At Thackeray Utilities the chief audit executive is presenting the proposed risk-based plan to the audit committee for approval. A committee member asks how the plan will handle risks that arise after approval, given that the organisation operates in a volatile market. Which response best reflects sound risk-based planning?

  • AThe plan is fixed once approved to protect its integrity, and any newly arising risk will be captured in the following year's assessment cycle.
  • BThe plan delegates authority to line management to decide during the year which emerging risks internal audit should examine, keeping the function responsive to the business.
  • CThe plan builds in a fixed contingency of unassigned hours at the start, and once those hours are consumed no further changes to coverage are made during the year.
  • DThe plan is reviewed and adjusted periodically as risks change, with significant revisions and their resource impact reported to the audit committee during the year. Correct
A risk-based plan is monitored and revised as risks change during the year, with significant updates reported to the audit committee. Sound risk-based planning treats the plan as dynamic, so responsiveness comes from the CAE periodically reassessing and reporting revisions to the committee, not from freezing the plan or delegating coverage decisions to management.

Why A is wrong: Stability sounds like good governance, but treating an approved plan as unchangeable ignores that a risk-based plan is meant to respond to change and would leave new risks uncovered for up to a year.

Why B is wrong: This appears responsive, but handing the decision on audit coverage to management compromises the function's independence and the CAE's ownership of the plan.

Why C is wrong: A contingency reserve is a reasonable tool, but capping responsiveness at a preset number of hours turns a dynamic plan back into a static one the moment the reserve runs out.

Why D is correct: Correct: a dynamic plan is monitored and updated as the risk profile shifts, and material changes are communicated to the committee, keeping coverage aligned with current risk while preserving the reporting line.

Free sampleInternal Audit Planmedium

The chief audit executive at Pinehurst Retail has completed the annual risk assessment, and the resulting list of high-risk areas would require more engagement hours than the approved audit resources can deliver. Management would prefer that lower-risk retail-store audits continue at their traditional frequency. How should the chief audit executive develop the plan?

  • ASpread the available hours evenly across all rated areas so that every part of the audit universe receives some coverage within the year.
  • BKeep the traditional store-audit frequency management prefers and fit the high-risk areas into whatever capacity is left over afterwards.
  • CAllocate the available resources to the highest-rated risks first, and communicate to the board any significant risks the plan cannot cover given the resource constraint. Correct
  • DReduce the assessed rating of several high-risk areas so that the resulting plan fits within the approved resources without a visible shortfall.
When resources cannot cover all high risks, the plan funds the greatest exposures first and the resulting assurance gap is reported to the board. Risk prioritisation exists to direct scarce audit capacity to the highest exposures, so a resource shortfall is handled by ranking and by disclosing the uncovered risk, not by flattening coverage or editing the ratings.

Why A is wrong: Even coverage feels fair, but distributing resources without regard to risk dilutes assurance over the areas that matter most and abandons the whole basis of a risk-based plan.

Why B is wrong: Honouring the historical schedule is tempting for stakeholder relations, but letting tradition and management preference outrank the risk assessment inverts the prioritisation the plan is meant to reflect.

Why C is correct: Correct: risk prioritisation directs limited resources to the greatest exposures, and the CAE must inform the board of the assurance gap created by the shortfall rather than absorb it silently.

Why D is wrong: This makes the plan look balanced, but manipulating risk ratings to match capacity corrupts the assessment and hides a real assurance gap from the board.

Free sampleInternal Audit Planmedium

At Brayford Utilities the chief audit executive is deciding how to rank candidate engagements for next year's plan. One senior auditor wants to sort areas by the gross exposure that exists before any controls are considered, while another wants to sort by the exposure that remains after existing controls are taken into account. Which basis should primarily drive the ranking for a risk-based plan?

  • AInherent risk, because ranking by gross exposure before controls gives the cleanest picture of where the organisation is most vulnerable.
  • BThe simple average of inherent and residual risk, so that both the raw exposure and the mitigated exposure carry equal weight in the ranking.
  • CControl risk alone, because the likelihood that controls fail to prevent or detect an issue is the decisive factor in where to audit.
  • DResidual risk, because the plan should target the exposure that remains after existing controls, which is where assurance effort adds the most value. Correct
Recognise that a risk-based audit plan prioritises engagements by residual risk, the exposure remaining after existing controls, rather than by inherent risk alone. Residual risk is what survives the organisation's own mitigation, so ranking the plan by residual exposure concentrates scarce assurance resources on the areas where meaningful uncovered risk still exists, which is the purpose of risk-based prioritisation.

Why A is wrong: Tempting because inherent risk highlights raw exposure, but a plan built on it ignores mitigation already in place and can over-allocate effort to well-controlled areas.

Why B is wrong: Tempting as a compromise, but averaging dilutes the residual signal and has no basis in risk-based planning, which targets uncovered exposure.

Why C is wrong: Tempting because control weakness matters, but control risk is one component of residual risk, not a standalone ranking basis for the whole plan.

Why D is correct: Correct: residual risk reflects the exposure left after mitigation, so prioritising it directs limited audit resources to where uncovered risk is greatest.

Other domains in this exam

See also the CIA-3 cert hub, the study guide, and the cheat sheet.

Examworthy is not affiliated with or endorsed by The Institute of Internal Auditors. Original, blueprint-aligned practice material only.