At Oakhurst Logistics the chief audit executive plans to rely on control testing performed six months ago by an external assurance provider whose competence and objectivity she has already confirmed. Since that testing, the company migrated the affected process to a new system. How should this change affect her reliance decision?
- AProceed with full reliance, because competence and objectivity were confirmed and those are the criteria that govern reliance
- BDiscard the earlier work completely and treat the migrated process as if no assurance had ever been obtained over it
- CAssess whether the earlier work still covers the current controls given the system change, and perform additional procedures on the parts the change has affected before relying Correct
- DRely on the earlier work and record the system change as a matter for the next planning cycle rather than the current one
Why A is wrong: Tempting because competence and objectivity are correctly confirmed, but relevance and currency also matter; work performed before a process changed may no longer address the controls now in operation.
Why B is wrong: Tempting because the change reduces the work's value, but portions unaffected by the migration may remain relevant, so discarding everything wastes reliable evidence and overstates the effect of the change.
Why C is correct: Correct. Reliance requires that the work remain relevant and sufficient for the current objective; a system migration since testing means the earlier evidence must be re-evaluated and gaps covered by fresh procedures.
Why D is wrong: Tempting because deferring keeps the current plan simple, but relying on evidence that predates a known process change and postponing the issue leaves a live control area inadequately assured.