SEE-1 - Advising the Individual Taxpayer (13% of the exam) - Section 5.3

Identify accuracy-related penalties, statutes of limitations on assessments and collections, and procedures for filing amended returns.

Identify the accuracy-related penalties imposed for negligence, substantial understatement, and substantial valuation misstatements, and describe the reasonable cause exception that can waive them. Recognise the standard three-year statute of limitations for assessment, the six-year extension for substantial omissions, and the procedure for correcting a filed return using Form 1040-X.

Accuracy-related penaltyStatute of limitationsForm 1040-XAmended return

Practice question for this objective

Free sampleAdvising the Individual Taxpayermedium

On audit, Bianca Whitfield is found to have an understatement of income tax that is both more than ten percent of the tax required to be shown on her return and more than 5,000 dollars. The understatement was not due to fraud, and she had no reasonable cause or substantial authority for the positions taken. Which penalty most directly applies to this understatement, and at what rate?

  • AThe failure-to-file penalty, generally five percent of the unpaid tax for each month the return is late
  • BThe accuracy-related penalty for a substantial understatement of income tax, equal to twenty percent of the underpayment Correct
  • CThe failure-to-pay penalty, generally one-half of one percent of the unpaid tax for each month it remains unpaid
  • DThe civil fraud penalty, equal to seventy-five percent of the portion of the underpayment attributable to fraud
Identify the twenty percent accuracy-related penalty for a substantial understatement and distinguish it from filing, payment, and fraud penalties. The accuracy-related penalty equals twenty percent of the underpayment and applies to a substantial understatement of income tax, defined as one exceeding the greater of ten percent of the tax required to be shown or 5,000 dollars, where no reasonable cause or substantial authority protects the position.

Why A is wrong: The failure-to-file penalty is triggered by filing a return late, not by understating tax on a return that was filed, so it does not address Bianca's accuracy problem.

Why B is correct: An understatement that exceeds the greater of ten percent of the required tax or 5,000 dollars is a substantial understatement, triggering the twenty percent accuracy-related penalty absent reasonable cause or substantial authority, which fits Bianca's facts.

Why C is wrong: The failure-to-pay penalty applies when tax shown or assessed is not paid by the due date; it does not address an understatement caused by incorrect positions on the return, so it is the wrong penalty here.

Why D is wrong: The seventy-five percent civil fraud penalty requires a showing of fraud, and the facts state the understatement was not fraudulent, so this penalty does not apply despite the size of the understatement.

See more SEE-1 practice questions, answers explained.

Exam traps in Advising the Individual Taxpayer

Answers that look right on this material and are not. Each one is a distractor from a different question in the SEE-1 bank for this domain.

  • The fraud penalty at 75 percent of the portion of the underpayment attributable to fraud

    Why it is wrong: The civil fraud penalty under Section 6663 is 75 percent but requires the IRS to prove the underpayment was due to fraud; the facts state there was no fraud, so this penalty does not apply.

  • Both portions are subject only to the 20 percent accuracy-related penalty, because negligence and fraud are simply two interchangeable grounds within one and the same single penalty provision.

    Why it is wrong: Negligence is one ground for the accuracy-related penalty, but civil fraud is a distinct and heavier penalty with its own clear-and-convincing standard of proof, so collapsing them into one 20 percent charge is wrong.

  • 15 April 2031, applying the six-year period for a substantial omission of gross income

    Why it is wrong: The six-year period under Section 6501(e) applies only when the taxpayer omits more than 25 percent of gross income; Daniel made no such substantial omission, so the extended six-year window does not apply.

Examworthy is not affiliated with or endorsed by IRS / Prometric. Original, blueprint-aligned practice material only.