Comprehensive business taxation knowledge for the IRS Special Enrollment Examination Part 2.
Free sample questions
No account needed. Every question has a worked explanation, just like the full bank.
lock_openFree sampleBusiness Tax Preparationhard
Marlowe Fabrication LLC, a calendar-year business, buys and places in service a single new metal lathe (7-year MACRS property) for 100,000 dollars on 3 March 2024. It is the only asset bought that year, so the mid-quarter convention does not apply. The firm elects out of both Section 179 and bonus depreciation and uses the standard 200 percent declining balance method with the half-year convention. What is its first-year MACRS depreciation deduction on the lathe?
- A14,290 dollars, using the 14.29 percent first-year rate that the MACRS table sets for 7-year recovery property under the half-year convention.check_circle Correct
- B20,000 dollars, using the 20.00 percent first-year rate that applies to 5-year recovery property under the half-year convention.
- C7,145 dollars, by taking the 14.29 percent 7-year rate and then halving it again because the asset was held for only part of the year.
- D28,580 dollars, by applying the 200 percent declining balance rate of two divided by seven to the full 100,000 dollar basis with no convention adjustment.
First-year MACRS on 7-year property under the half-year convention uses the 14.29 percent table rate, which already incorporates the half year. MACRS percentage tables combine the 200 percent declining balance method, the recovery period and the applicable convention into a single rate. For 7-year property under the half-year convention the first-year rate is 14.29 percent, so the deduction is 100,000 multiplied by 0.1429, or 14,290 dollars. The half year is already baked into the table rate, so no further halving is correct.
Why A is correct: A metal lathe is 7-year MACRS property, and the half-year-convention table gives a 14.29 percent first-year rate, so 100,000 multiplied by 14.29 percent equals 14,290 dollars.
Why B is wrong: Applying the 5-year first-year rate of 20 percent is a common slip when the recovery period is misread, but a metal lathe is 7-year property, so the correct first-year rate is 14.29 percent, not 20 percent.
Why C is wrong: Halving the table percentage is tempting if the candidate thinks the half-year convention must be applied on top of the rate, but the published 14.29 percent rate already builds in the half-year convention, so applying a second half is double-counting.
Why D is wrong: Computing two divided by seven of basis (28.58 percent) looks like the declining balance method, but it ignores the half-year convention that halves the first-year deduction, which the 14.29 percent table rate already reflects.
lock_openFree sampleBusiness Tax Preparationhard
Cedarpoint Joinery Inc, a calendar-year C corporation, places in service 3,300,000 dollars of qualifying new Section 179 property during 2024 and has taxable income from the business well above any expense it could claim. For 2024 the Section 179 dollar limit is 1,220,000 dollars and the investment phase-out begins once qualifying property placed in service exceeds 3,050,000 dollars. What is the maximum Section 179 deduction Cedarpoint may elect for 2024?
- A1,220,000 dollars, because taxable income exceeds the limit and the firm therefore takes the full indexed dollar cap with no reduction.
- B970,000 dollars, because the limit is reduced by the 250,000 dollars of qualifying property placed in service above the 3,050,000 dollar phase-out threshold.check_circle Correct
- C0 dollars, because total qualifying property of 3,300,000 dollars exceeds the 3,050,000 dollar threshold, which disqualifies the corporation from any Section 179 election.
- D1,205,000 dollars, by reducing the 1,220,000 dollar limit by 15,000 dollars representing 6 percent of the property placed in service over the threshold.
The Section 179 dollar limit is reduced dollar for dollar by qualifying property placed in service above the annual investment threshold. For 2024 the maximum Section 179 deduction is 1,220,000 dollars, but it phases out dollar for dollar once qualifying property placed in service exceeds 3,050,000 dollars. With 3,300,000 dollars placed in service, the 250,000 dollar excess reduces the limit to 970,000 dollars. The reduction is the full excess, not a percentage, and it does not eliminate the deduction unless the excess reaches the dollar limit.
Why A is wrong: Taking the full 1,220,000 dollar cap ignores the investment-based phase-out, which reduces the limit dollar for dollar once property placed in service passes 3,050,000 dollars, so the full cap is not available here.
Why B is correct: Property of 3,300,000 dollars exceeds the 3,050,000 dollar threshold by 250,000 dollars, and the 1,220,000 dollar limit drops dollar for dollar by that excess, giving 1,220,000 minus 250,000, or 970,000 dollars.
Why C is wrong: Treating the threshold as a hard cliff is a common error, but crossing it only reduces the limit by the excess; the deduction reaches zero only when the excess equals or passes the dollar limit, which it does not here.
Why D is wrong: Reducing the limit by a percentage of the excess misstates the rule, which subtracts the full excess amount dollar for dollar, not a fraction of it, so 970,000 dollars is correct rather than 1,205,000 dollars.
lock_openFree sampleSpecialized Returns and Taxpayersmedium
Brightwater Community Arts, a newly formed nonstock nonprofit corporation, plans to operate solely to teach free painting and music classes to disadvantaged children. Its founders want federal recognition of exemption under Section 501(c)(3) so that donors can deduct contributions. The organisation is not a church, not a school, and expects annual gross receipts well above 50,000 dollars. Its lawyer asks which application the organisation must file with the IRS to obtain a determination letter recognising its exempt status. Which form should Brightwater file?
- AForm 1023, Application for Recognition of Exemption Under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, the full application used by organisations that are not eligible for the streamlined version.check_circle Correct
- BForm 1024, Application for Recognition of Exemption Under Section 501(a) or Section 521, the application used by charitable organisations seeking 501(c)(3) status.
- CForm 1023-EZ, Streamlined Application for Recognition of Exemption Under Section 501(c)(3), which any organisation may use regardless of its expected gross receipts.
- DForm 8976, Notice of Intent to Operate Under Section 501(c)(4), filed electronically to notify the IRS that the organisation is operating as a charity.
A charity seeking recognition under Section 501(c)(3) applies on Form 1023, using Form 1023-EZ only when it meets the small-organisation eligibility limits. An organisation that wants the IRS to recognise it as tax-exempt under Section 501(c)(3) applies for a determination letter on Form 1023. A streamlined Form 1023-EZ exists, but only organisations that pass an eligibility worksheet may use it, and one condition is that projected annual gross receipts do not exceed 50,000 dollars. Brightwater expects receipts well above that ceiling, so it is ineligible for the short form and must file the full Form 1023. Form 1024 covers exemption under other paragraphs of Section 501(c), and Form 8976 is the operating notice for 501(c)(4) social welfare organisations, so neither fits a charity seeking 501(c)(3) recognition.
Why A is correct: A 501(c)(3) organisation generally seeks recognition by filing Form 1023, and because Brightwater expects gross receipts above the streamlined eligibility ceiling it must use the full Form 1023 rather than the short-form alternative, making this the correct application.
Why B is wrong: Form 1024 is used by organisations seeking exemption under most other paragraphs of Section 501(c), such as 501(c)(4) or 501(c)(6), not by 501(c)(3) charities, so naming it here applies the wrong application form.
Why C is wrong: Form 1023-EZ is restricted to small organisations that meet the eligibility limits, including projected annual gross receipts of 50,000 dollars or less; Brightwater expects more, so it is not eligible for the streamlined form.
Why D is wrong: Form 8976 is the notice a 501(c)(4) social welfare organisation files, not a recognition application for a 501(c)(3) charity, so it neither recognises exemption nor applies to Brightwater's charitable purpose.
More free SEE-2 practice questions with worked answersExamworthy is not affiliated with or endorsed by IRS / Prometric. All questions are original, blueprint-aligned practice material. We never reproduce live exam items. SEE-2 and related marks belong to their respective owners.
