Which statement correctly distinguishes the 30-day letter from the statutory notice of deficiency (the 90-day letter)?
- AThe 30-day letter offers an administrative conference with Appeals, while the statutory notice provides the right to petition the Tax Court without prepaying the tax. Correct
- BBoth letters open an appeal to the Office of Appeals, but the 90-day letter also requires the taxpayer to file a written protest within the longer period.
- CThe 30-day letter is issued by the Office of Appeals, while the statutory notice is issued by the examiner who conducted the audit.
- DThe 30-day letter must be answered by petitioning the Tax Court, while the 90-day letter must be answered by a protest to Appeals.
Why A is correct: Correct: the 30-day letter is the administrative-appeal route and the statutory notice is the judicial route to the Tax Court, the precise contrast the two letters are meant to draw.
Why B is wrong: Only the 30-day letter routes to Appeals by protest; pairing a protest with the 90-day letter blends the two stages, a common mix-up because both letters follow an exam.
Why C is wrong: The issuers are reversed: the examination function sends the 30-day letter and the statutory notice is the agency's formal deficiency notice, so this swaps the offices that act at each stage.
Why D is wrong: This reverses the correct routes for both letters; it is tempting only if a candidate memorised that two routes exist without learning which letter feeds which.