An information security manager is establishing a new incident response plan and wants to ensure it interlocks correctly with the existing business continuity and disaster recovery plans. Which element should the incident response plan define so that the business continuity plan and disaster recovery plan are invoked at the right moment?
- AThe detailed alternate-site rebuild runbooks that engineers follow once failover has been authorised.
- BThe annual budget and licensing schedule for the security monitoring tools used to detect incidents.
- CThe criteria and thresholds that classify an incident's severity and trigger invocation of the business continuity and disaster recovery plans. Correct
- DThe full list of regulatory breach-notification templates to be sent to data protection authorities.
Why A is wrong: Rebuild runbooks are valuable, but they belong to the disaster recovery plan's execution detail; they do not define when that plan should be invoked.
Why B is wrong: Tool budgets support detection capability, but they are a resourcing matter and play no part in deciding when the business continuity or disaster recovery plans are triggered.
Why C is correct: Severity classification and invocation thresholds in the incident response plan are the handover point; they determine precisely when the business continuity and disaster recovery plans are activated, making this the interlocking element.
Why D is wrong: Notification templates are a genuine incident response output, which makes them tempting, but they govern external communication, not the threshold that invokes the continuity and recovery plans.