Windows 11 laptops in your tenant are Microsoft Entra joined, enrolled in Microsoft Intune and encrypted with BitLocker by a disk encryption policy that escrows the recovery password to Microsoft Entra ID. A security review requires that any recovery password read out to a user during a support call is replaced afterwards by the service desk, using the BitLocker key rotation remote action in the Microsoft Intune admin center. On a test laptop that action does not produce a new recovery password. Which prerequisite has to be in place before that remote action can rotate the key?
- AThe operating system drive has to be decrypted and then encrypted again by the disk encryption policy, because a recovery password can be replaced only while encryption is being applied to the drive.
- BThe service desk account has to hold the Intune Administrator role, because replacing a recovery password is reserved for tenant wide administrators rather than for a scoped role carrying device remote action permissions.
- CA disk encryption policy has to enable client driven recovery password rotation for the join type these laptops hold, because the BitLocker client on the device is what generates and escrows the replacement password. Correct
- DA compliance policy that requires BitLocker has to be assigned to the laptops, because Intune issues a rotation request only against a device that a compliance policy currently reports as being in a compliant state.
Why A is wrong: It is tempting because a fresh recovery password is indeed generated when a drive is first encrypted, but rotation is a live operation on an already encrypted drive and decrypting the volume would remove the protection the review depends on.
Why B is wrong: It is tempting because recovery key work is sensitive and feels like a tenant wide privilege, but the remote action is governed by ordinary Intune role permissions on devices, so a scoped role that carries them can issue it.
Why C is correct: Correct, because the remote action only asks the BitLocker client to rotate, and the client acts on that request when policy has enabled client driven recovery password rotation for the device's join type.
Why D is wrong: It is tempting because compliance policies commonly appear alongside disk encryption work, but a compliance policy reports a state and never gates a remote action, so its presence or absence changes nothing about rotation.