A security architect is enabling automatic attack disruption in Microsoft Defender XDR so that it can autonomously contain a confirmed human-operated ransomware attack across the estate. Endpoint signals are onboarded and automated investigation is running. The architect must ensure disruption is not blocked from taking its containment actions. Which configuration condition must be satisfied for the automatic disruption actions to be applied to the affected assets?
- AA Microsoft Sentinel scheduled analytics rule must first be authored to detect the ransomware pattern before disruption can act on it
- BDevices must keep an automation level enabled, because disruption is blocked where the device group is set to no automated remediation Correct
- CAn analyst must approve each disruption action in the Action center before Microsoft Defender XDR applies it to a targeted device
- DA custom detection rule must be created at the highest frequency so that disruption inherits its device-containment response action
Why A is wrong: Tempting because Sentinel often drives response, but attack disruption is a native Microsoft Defender XDR capability driven by high-confidence XDR signals, not by any Sentinel rule.
Why B is correct: Correct: disruption applies containment through the automated response pipeline, so a device group set to no automated remediation prevents the automatic actions from being applied.
Why C is wrong: Tempting because approvals exist for AIR remediations, but disruption is designed to act automatically without analyst approval; requiring approval would defeat its real-time purpose.
Why D is wrong: Tempting as custom detection rules can isolate devices, but disruption does not depend on a custom rule; it acts on built-in high-confidence correlated signals across XDR.