SAP-C02 - Design Solutions for Organizational Complexity (26% of the exam) - Section 1.1

Design hybrid connectivity and name resolution between on-premises, co-location and AWS using AWS Direct Connect, AWS Site-to-Site VPN and Amazon Route 53 Resolver.

Design hybrid connectivity between on-premises networks and AWS using AWS Direct Connect and AWS Site-to-Site VPN, and extend name resolution across both environments with Amazon Route 53 Resolver inbound and outbound endpoints. Distinguish when redundant Direct Connect links, VPN failover, or co-location placement best meets latency and availability requirements.

AWS Direct ConnectAWS Site-to-Site VPNAmazon Route 53 ResolverHybrid DNS

Practice question for this objective

Free sampleDesign Solutions for Organizational Complexityhard

A manufacturer is migrating workloads to AWS and needs name resolution to work in both directions over its existing Direct Connect connection. Resources in its VPCs must resolve records hosted in the company's on-premises Active Directory DNS, and on-premises servers must resolve records in private hosted zones associated with the VPCs. The team wants a managed solution that avoids running and patching its own DNS forwarder fleet on EC2. Which Amazon Route 53 Resolver configuration MOST efficiently provides this bidirectional hybrid DNS?

  • ADeploy a Route 53 Resolver inbound endpoint and forwarding rules pointing at the on-premises DNS servers so queries from both the VPCs and on-premises flow through the single inbound endpoint.
  • BRun a pair of self-managed BIND forwarders on EC2 in each VPC that conditionally forward corporate-domain queries to Active Directory and answer all other queries from the Route 53 private hosted zones.
  • CDeploy only a Route 53 Resolver outbound endpoint with forwarding rules for the corporate domain, relying on it to also receive and answer queries originating from the on-premises Active Directory servers.
  • DDeploy a Route 53 Resolver outbound endpoint with forwarding rules for the corporate domain, plus an inbound endpoint that on-premises servers query to resolve the VPC private hosted zone records. Correct
Provide bidirectional hybrid DNS with a Route 53 Resolver outbound endpoint plus forwarding rules and an inbound endpoint, avoiding self-managed forwarders. Route 53 Resolver outbound endpoints with forwarding rules send selected domain queries from VPCs to on-premises DNS, and inbound endpoints expose Route 53 to on-premises resolvers so they can query private hosted zones. Using both directions together delivers fully managed two-way resolution over Direct Connect, removing the need to operate a BIND or Windows forwarder fleet on EC2 that a single endpoint or self-managed instances cannot match.

Why A is wrong: An inbound endpoint only handles queries arriving from on-premises into Route 53, so on its own it cannot forward VPC queries out to Active Directory, leaving one direction of resolution broken.

Why B is wrong: Self-managed BIND forwarders can bridge both directions, but they reintroduce exactly the DNS server fleet the team wants to avoid patching and scaling, so they are not the managed answer.

Why C is wrong: An outbound endpoint with forwarding rules resolves the VPC-to-on-premises direction, but it cannot receive queries from on-premises, so Active Directory servers still have no way to resolve the private hosted zone records.

Why D is correct: An outbound endpoint with conditional forwarding rules sends corporate-domain queries from the VPCs to Active Directory, while an inbound endpoint gives on-premises servers a target to resolve private hosted zones, providing managed bidirectional resolution with no DNS fleet to maintain.

See more SAP-C02 practice questions, answers explained.

Exam traps in Design Solutions for Organizational Complexity

Answers that look right on this material and are not. Each one is a distractor from a different question in the SAP-C02 bank for this domain.

  • Order a second Direct Connect dedicated connection at a different location and run both connections active so that the loss of either one leaves the other carrying the full production traffic load.

    Why it is wrong: A second dedicated connection gives strong resilience, but paying for full standby Direct Connect capacity exceeds what a short reduced-traffic failover needs, so it is not the most cost-effective option for this requirement.

  • Replace the outbound endpoints with one Route 53 Resolver inbound endpoint in the central account and point every VPC's DNS at it so all member VPCs forward corporate queries through that shared inbound endpoint.

    Why it is wrong: An inbound endpoint lets on-premises resolve VPC records, which is the opposite direction, and does not forward VPC queries out to the on-premises corporate domain as required here.

  • Create a private virtual interface to a Direct Connect gateway and route the on-premises traffic into a VPC, then reach Amazon S3 and DynamoDB through gateway VPC endpoints in that VPC.

    Why it is wrong: A private virtual interface reaches resources inside a VPC, but gateway VPC endpoints are not reachable from on-premises over Direct Connect, so this path cannot deliver the on-premises traffic to those services privately.

Examworthy is not affiliated with or endorsed by Amazon Web Services. Original, blueprint-aligned practice material only.