How does a callable preferred stock differ from a convertible preferred stock with respect to who controls the feature and what the holder ultimately receives?
- AWith callable preferred the holder may force the issuer to redeem the shares for cash, while with convertible preferred the issuer may compel an exchange into the company's bonds.
- BBoth features are controlled by the issuer, and each results in the preferred shares being exchanged for the issuer's common stock at a stated ratio.
- CThe call feature is controlled by the issuer, which may redeem the shares at a stated price, while the conversion feature is controlled by the holder, who may exchange the shares for common stock. Correct
- DThe call feature lets the holder demand redemption at par, while the conversion feature lets the issuer swap the shares for common stock whenever it chooses.
Why A is wrong: This is tempting because both features do involve a right to act, but it reverses control on both counts: the call belongs to the issuer, not the holder, and conversion produces common stock, not bonds.
Why B is wrong: It correctly notes the call is an issuer right, but it wrongly assigns the conversion decision to the issuer and wrongly says a call converts into common stock rather than redeeming for cash.
Why C is correct: Correct: a call is the issuer's option to buy the preferred back at the call price, and conversion is the holder's option to swap the preferred for a fixed number of common shares.
Why D is wrong: It is attractive to a candidate who confuses which party benefits, but it inverts both rights: the issuer controls the call and the holder controls conversion, the opposite of what is stated.