How does an open-end investment company differ from a closed-end investment company in the way its shares are issued and priced?
- ABoth continuously issue new redeemable shares that trade on an exchange at a price set purely by supply and demand throughout the day.
- BAn open-end company issues a fixed number of shares redeemed at net asset value, while a closed-end company continuously issues new shares priced by supply and demand.
- CBoth issue a fixed number of shares, but only the closed-end company allows redemption directly with the issuer at net asset value.
- DAn open-end company continuously issues redeemable shares priced at net asset value plus any applicable sales charge, while a closed-end company issues a fixed number of shares that then trade in the secondary market at a market price. Correct
Why A is wrong: This is tempting because both are pooled investment companies, but it wrongly merges their features: only a closed-end company trades on an exchange by supply and demand, and its shares are not redeemable with the issuer.
Why B is wrong: This is the correct distinction reversed. The fixed share count belongs to the closed-end structure, and continuous issuance of redeemable shares belongs to the open-end structure, so the labels are swapped.
Why C is wrong: This is wrong on both counts: the open-end company does not have a fixed share count, and it is the open-end company, not the closed-end company, whose shares are redeemable with the issuer at net asset value.
Why D is correct: Correct: an open-end fund stands ready to issue and redeem shares at net asset value under the Investment Company Act of 1940, whereas a closed-end fund floats a fixed share count that afterwards trades at a market price independent of net asset value.