A logistics company runs a flat internal network that includes printers, finance workstations, warehouse handhelds, and a small data centre. The CISO has approved a project to introduce network segmentation after a worm propagated freely across all hosts during a recent tabletop exercise. The lead network engineer must decide what to deploy at the new segment boundaries to minimise lateral movement during a future intrusion. Which control PRIMARILY meets that objective?
- AStateful inspection firewalls enforcing least-privilege rulesets between each segment and logging east-west flows centrally. Correct
- BRouter access control lists filtering inbound packets at the perimeter Internet edge during business hours.
- CA network intrusion detection sensor mirroring all traffic from the core switch to a SOC analytics platform.
- DHost-based antivirus with signature updates pushed twice daily to every endpoint in the estate.
Why A is correct: Stateful firewalls applied between internal zones enforce explicit allow lists for east-west traffic, which is exactly what stops worm-style propagation between previously flat segments. The matching connection-state tracking and centralised logging give the SOC both the prevention and the visibility needed to limit and detect lateral movement, making this the PRIMARY control for the objective.
Why B is wrong: Perimeter ACLs protect against external traffic and ignore internal segment-to-segment flows, so they do nothing about a worm already inside the network. Time-of-day filtering further weakens coverage, and ACLs are stateless, missing connection-context attacks that stateful inspection would catch.
Why C is wrong: Passive detection helps the SOC see a worm spreading but cannot stop the propagation in line. Detection without enforcement leaves the lateral movement requirement unmet, and a single mirrored sensor at the core has blind spots into intra-segment traffic that never crosses it.
Why D is wrong: Endpoint antivirus is a useful layer but is signature-driven, lags against novel worms, and has historically failed on the very type of incident described in the tabletop. It also does not provide network-level segmentation, which is the control the CISO has specifically approved.