CAPM - Business Analysis Frameworks (27% of the exam) - Section 4.3

Maintain requirements traceability and monitor requirements through their life cycle using a requirements traceability matrix.

Maintain a requirements traceability matrix that links each requirement back to a business objective and forward to the design, build, and test that satisfy it. Recognise that traceability supports impact analysis when change is requested and confirms that every approved requirement is delivered and nothing extra is built.

Requirements traceability matrixTraceabilityImpact analysisRequirements life cycle

Practice question for this objective

Free sampleBusiness Analysis Frameworksmedium

On the Fernway claims system, a stakeholder proposes changing an approved requirement mid-release. Before the change is accepted, the business analyst uses the traceability matrix to assess how the change will ripple through the solution. What is this activity called?

  • ARequirements elicitation, gathering fresh requirements from the stakeholder who raised the proposed change
  • BRequirements validation, confirming with users that the delivered solution meets the underlying business need
  • CImpact analysis, using the traceability links to identify which related requirements, designs, and tests the change would affect Correct
  • DSolution verification, testing that each built component conforms to its documented specification
Impact analysis uses traceability links to identify every requirement, design, and test a proposed change would affect before the change is approved. Because the matrix already connects each requirement to its related items, the analyst can follow those links outward from the changed requirement to find every dependent design, build, and test, giving the change decision a complete picture of the ripple effect.

Why A is wrong: Elicitation draws out new or clarified requirements. It is tempting because a stakeholder is involved, but here the analyst is assessing the effect of a known change, not discovering new requirements.

Why B is wrong: Validation checks that the right product was built. It is plausible because both look across the solution, but validation confirms fitness for need rather than tracing the reach of a proposed change.

Why C is correct: Impact analysis uses the matrix links to trace a proposed change to every connected requirement, design, and test, so the change board can weigh its full effect before deciding.

Why D is wrong: Verification checks that the product was built right against its spec. It is tempting because it also uses traceability, but it confirms conformance of what exists rather than forecasting the effect of a change.

See more CAPM practice questions, answers explained.

Exam traps in Business Analysis Frameworks

Answers that look right on this material and are not. Each one is a distractor from a different question in the CAPM bank for this domain.

  • Freeze the matrix at its baselined state so it preserves an unaltered record of the original requirements

    Why it is wrong: Preserving history has value, but a frozen matrix would no longer reflect the approved change and would fail its purpose of tracing current requirements to deliverables.

  • To store the effort estimates and cost figures the sponsor will use to set the project budget for each release

    Why it is wrong: Estimates and budget figures live in planning and cost documents, not the traceability matrix. It is tempting because both are project artefacts, but the matrix records relationships between requirements and other work, not costs.

  • It sets the daily rate the vendor will charge to make the change

    Why it is wrong: Pricing a change is a procurement and estimating activity; the matrix reveals what is connected to the requirement, not what a vendor will bill.

Examworthy is not affiliated with or endorsed by PMI. Original, blueprint-aligned practice material only.