How does a Percent of Total table calculation differ from a Running Total table calculation when both are computed across the same dimension?
- APercent of Total accumulates each value onto the previous ones, while Running Total expresses each value as a share of the partition's sum.
- BPercent of Total divides each mark by the total of all marks in the partition, while Running Total adds each mark to the cumulative sum of the marks before it. Correct
- CBoth produce the same final value in the last cell, because the cumulative sum and the share both reach one hundred percent at the end.
- DPercent of Total can only be computed down a pane, whereas Running Total can only be computed across a table.
Why A is wrong: This reverses the two definitions; accumulation is what Running Total does and the share-of-sum behaviour belongs to Percent of Total, so the labels are swapped.
Why B is correct: This states both mechanisms correctly: Percent of Total normalises each value against the partition total, and Running Total carries a cumulative sum as it moves across the addressing direction.
Why C is wrong: The last Running Total cell equals the partition's full sum as a raw figure, not a percentage; only Percent of Total reaches one hundred percent, so the values differ.
Why D is wrong: Both calculations let you choose any addressing direction through Compute Using; neither is locked to a single direction, so this restriction is invented.