Marguerite is 73, married filing jointly, and must take a required minimum distribution of 30,000 dollars from her traditional Individual Retirement Account this year. She gives 20,000 dollars a year to a public charity and has no other deductible outlays apart from 9,000 dollars of state and local taxes and mortgage interest combined. Assume the standard deduction for a married couple filing jointly is 31,500 dollars and the annual limit on qualified charitable distributions is 108,000 dollars per person. She does not need the distributed cash to fund her spending. Which approach produces the lowest taxable income for her this year?
- AGive 20,000 dollars in cash and itemize, since the gift now takes her above the standard deduction
- BDirect 20,000 dollars of the required minimum distribution to the charity as a qualified charitable distribution Correct
- CTake the full 30,000 dollar distribution and give 20,000 dollars of the proceeds in cash to the charity
- DGive 20,000 dollars of appreciated shares from her taxable account and take the standard deduction
Why A is wrong: Her itemized deductions would total 20,000 plus 9,000, or 29,000 dollars, which is below the 31,500 dollar standard deduction, so itemizing is worse than not itemizing. The gift buys her no deduction at all and the whole 30,000 dollar distribution stays in income.
Why B is correct: She is past the qualifying age and the amount is within the annual limit, so the 20,000 dollars is excluded from gross income and still counts toward the required minimum distribution. Only the remaining 10,000 dollars is taxed, and she keeps the 31,500 dollar standard deduction in full.
Why C is wrong: This is the intuitive route and it does fund the gift, but the deduction is stranded because 29,000 dollars of itemized deductions still lose to the 31,500 dollar standard deduction. The full 30,000 dollars remains in adjusted gross income, which can also raise the cost of Medicare premiums.
Why D is wrong: Donating appreciated securities is sound advice for a client who itemizes, because it avoids the unrealised gain and deducts fair market value. Here the charitable deduction is lost under the standard deduction anyway, and the required minimum distribution is still fully taxable.