Tax reduction/management techniques

Timing income and deductions, bunching, Roth conversions and bracket management, tax-efficient withdrawal sequencing, charitable bunching with donor-advised funds, qualified charitable distributions, and asset location. Items ask which technique yields the largest tax saving for a described client.

Roth conversionQualified charitable distribution

Practice question for this objective

Free sampleTax Planninghard

Harriet is 73, retired, and takes the standard deduction because her only significant itemisable expense is charitable giving. Her required minimum distribution from her traditional Individual Retirement Account for the year is 40,000 dollars. Early in the year she instructs the account custodian to pay 20,000 dollars directly to a local operating public charity, and later she withdraws the remaining 20,000 dollars in cash for her own use. Assume the annual limit on qualified charitable distributions is 108,000 dollars and that the charity is an eligible recipient. How is the year treated for federal income tax?

AThe full 40,000 dollars enters her gross income and she claims a 20,000 dollar charitable deduction, which helps her only if she itemises
BThe 20,000 dollars paid to the charity is excluded from gross income and counts towards her required minimum distribution, so only the cash she kept is taxable Correct
CThe 20,000 dollars paid to the charity is excluded from gross income but does not count towards her required minimum distribution, so a further 20,000 dollars must still be withdrawn
DThe 20,000 dollars paid to the charity is excluded from gross income and she may also claim a 20,000 dollar charitable deduction against her remaining income

A qualified charitable distribution is excluded from gross income and satisfies the required minimum distribution, so no charitable deduction may also be claimed. The transfer works because the money never passes through Harriet's gross income. Her required minimum distribution is 40,000 dollars. The 20,000 dollars paid directly by the custodian to an eligible charity is excluded from income and is credited against that requirement, leaving 20,000 dollars still to be taken. She takes that amount in cash and it is fully taxable as ordinary income, so her reported taxable distribution for the year is 20,000 dollars rather than 40,000 dollars. Because the amount was excluded rather than deducted, she cannot also claim it as a charitable contribution. The exclusion is worth more to her than a deduction would be: it reduces adjusted gross income itself, which matters for a standard deduction taxpayer and can also ease income-linked charges elsewhere on the return.

Why A is wrong: This is the treatment of an ordinary withdrawal followed by a personal cheque to the charity, and it is exactly the outcome the direct transfer avoids; because Harriet takes the standard deduction the offsetting deduction would be worth nothing to her.

Why B is correct: A qualified charitable distribution is excluded from gross income and satisfies the required minimum distribution to the extent of the amount transferred, so 20,000 dollars is excluded and only the 20,000 dollars she withdrew for herself is taxed.

Why C is wrong: The exclusion is stated correctly but the required minimum distribution point is reversed; amounts transferred under this route do count towards the distribution requirement, which is the main reason planners use it for clients who give anyway.

Why D is wrong: This claims the exclusion and the deduction for the same dollars, which would be a double benefit; the rule permits one or the other, and a qualified charitable distribution is expressly not deductible as a charitable contribution.

See more CFP practice questions, answers explained.

Exam traps in Tax Planning

Answers that look right on this material and are not. Each one is a distractor from a different question in the CFP bank for this domain.

25,350 dollars, the gap between his wage income and the top of the 22 percent bracket
Why it is wrong: This measures the room from gross income rather than taxable income, so it ignores the standard deduction that shelters the first 15,750 dollars. It leaves 15,750 dollars of bracket room unused and wastes part of a low income year that will not repeat.
17,000 dollars of additional deductions when the two years are taken together
Why it is wrong: This counts the first year excess of itemized deductions over the standard deduction and then counts it a second time, as though bunching helped in both years. The second year gives no incremental benefit at all, because the couple simply falls back on the same standard deduction they would have used anyway.
The 401(k) share may be paid to her under the divorce decree alone, while the Individual Retirement Account must be split by a qualified domestic relations order.
Why it is wrong: This reverses the two regimes. The order is the mechanism for a plan governed by the anti-alienation rules, and an Individual Retirement Account is not such a plan, so it is divided under the divorce instrument itself.

Examworthy is not affiliated with or endorsed by CFP Board. Original, blueprint-aligned practice material only.