A finance analyst at Thornbury Council contacts the service desk to ask for a new licensed copy of an approved reporting application to be installed on her laptop, a request the desk fulfils dozens of times a month against an agreed procedure. The analyst is not reporting any fault; her existing tools work normally. Under ITIL 4, how should the service desk treat this, and why?
- AAs an incident, because installing new software changes the state of her device and any change to a service should be logged as an incident
- BAs a problem, because a recurring high volume of the same request points to an underlying cause that problem management should investigate
- CAs an emergency change, because installing software modifies the environment and any modification needs expedited change authorisation
- DAs a service request, because it is a request from a user for something normal that is part of agreed service delivery, handled by service request management Correct
Why A is wrong: Tempting because both flow through the service desk, but an incident is an unplanned interruption or reduction in quality of a service, and nothing here is broken or degraded, so it cannot be an incident.
Why B is wrong: Tempting because the volume is high, but a problem is a cause of one or more incidents; a normal, expected demand for a supported service is not a fault to be diagnosed.
Why C is wrong: Tempting because software installs do alter a device, but routine fulfilment of a pre-agreed request is handled by service request management, not raised as an emergency change, which is reserved for urgent unplanned situations.
Why D is correct: Correct: ITIL 4 defines a service request as a request from a user for something normal and expected as part of agreed service delivery, and installing an approved application against a standard procedure fits this exactly.