A French data protection officer is explaining why, despite the GDPR being a directly applicable regulation, the level of data protection law still differs in some respects between Member States. A junior colleague assumes a regulation must mean fully identical rules everywhere. Which feature of the GDPR best explains why some genuine national variation persists?
- AThe GDPR contains opening clauses that permit Member States to specify or further restrict certain matters in their national law Correct
- BThe GDPR must be transposed into a national statute by each Member State before it can take effect domestically
- CEach supervisory authority is free to rewrite the operative articles of the GDPR for application in its own territory
- DThe GDPR applies only to Member States that have chosen to opt in, and the rest may set entirely separate rules
Why A is correct: The GDPR includes opening clauses, for example on the age of consent for information society services and on processing in the employment context, which deliberately leave room for national specification.
Why B is wrong: This is tempting because it describes a directive, but a regulation needs no transposition to take effect, so transposition is not the source of the remaining variation.
Why C is wrong: Supervisory authorities interpret and enforce the GDPR but cannot rewrite its articles, so this overstates their powers and is not why variation exists.
Why D is wrong: There is no opt-in mechanism for the GDPR across Member States; it binds them all, so an opt-in cannot explain the residual national differences.