A predictive infrastructure project has identified a threat that a legacy database may corrupt records during a planned migration, assessed as moderate probability and high schedule impact. The project manager decides to run several trial migrations on a copy of the data and add automated integrity checks before the live cutover, aiming to reduce both the chance and the severity of corruption. Which risk response does this course of action represent?
- AAvoiding the risk, because the trial runs remove the migration from the project scope entirely.
- BTransferring the risk, because the integrity checks shift responsibility for any corruption onto the tooling vendor.
- CMitigating the risk, because the actions lower the probability and impact while the project still owns the threat. Correct
- DAccepting the risk, because the team proceeds with the migration and simply monitors for any corruption.
Why A is wrong: This is tempting because trial runs feel like eliminating danger, but avoidance removes a threat by changing the plan so it cannot occur; the live migration still goes ahead, so the threat is reduced, not avoided.
Why B is wrong: Transfer is tempting because a tool is involved, but transfer hands the impact and ownership to a third party through a contract or insurance; using a tool internally does not move liability to the vendor.
Why C is correct: Mitigation reduces the probability or impact of a threat to an acceptable level while the project retains the risk, which is exactly what trial migrations and automated integrity checks achieve here.
Why D is wrong: Acceptance takes no proactive action beyond monitoring or holding a reserve; here the team actively changes how the migration is performed, which is more than acceptance.