The Harbour Rail depot upgrade has a scope of work that is well defined and unlikely to change. The buyer wants to hand the cost overrun risk to the supplier so that the price the depot pays is locked regardless of the supplier's actual costs. Which contract type best achieves this?
- ACost-plus-fixed-fee, because the supplier recovers all allowable costs and a set fee, giving the buyer a predictable total.
- BFirm fixed price, because the price is set at the outset and the supplier absorbs any cost above that figure. Correct
- CTime and materials, because the agreed hourly rates cap what the supplier can charge the depot for the work.
- DCost-plus-incentive-fee, because the incentive formula rewards the supplier for staying below target and protects the buyer's budget.
Why A is wrong: This is tempting because the fee is fixed, but under any cost-reimbursable contract the buyer still pays the supplier's actual costs, so the cost overrun risk sits with the buyer, not the supplier.
Why B is correct: A firm fixed price locks the buyer's payment, so if the supplier's costs exceed the agreed price the supplier bears the loss, which places the cost overrun risk on the seller as required.
Why C is wrong: Rates are agreed but hours and quantities are not, so the final price rises with the effort the supplier expends, leaving the buyer exposed to overruns rather than transferring that risk.
Why D is wrong: The incentive shares savings and overruns between the parties, so the buyer still funds actual costs and carries part of the overrun risk rather than transferring it fully to the supplier.