At Larkfield Council's IT team, a manager wants to automate the joiner-mover-leaver access process straight away to cut effort. The current process contains two approval steps that duplicate each other and a form field nobody reads. Following the Optimize and automate guiding principle, what should the team do first?
- AStreamline the process to remove the duplicated approvals and the unused field, then automate what remains. Correct
- BAutomate the process exactly as it stands so the effort savings arrive sooner, then tidy up the steps afterwards.
- CAutomate the two approval steps but leave the unused form field in place in case it is needed later.
- DAbandon automation entirely and keep the process manual so that human judgement is retained at every step.
Why A is correct: Correct: the principle is optimize first, then automate, so waste is removed before technology is applied and only genuinely valuable steps are automated.
Why B is wrong: Tempting because it promises the quickest return, but Optimize and automate warns against automating a wasteful process; you would simply make the duplicated approvals run faster.
Why C is wrong: Tempting as a cautious middle path, but it still automates duplicated approvals and preserves a step that adds no value, which contradicts optimising before automating.
Why D is wrong: Tempting as a safe option, but Optimize and automate encourages automation of routine work; the principle asks you to optimise first, not to reject automation.